It’s good to study the scriptures with a friend. Over the years, I’ve gotten into the habit of bouncing any big insights I glean from my scriptures study off my friend and co-author of this blog, Stisa. Such was the case leading up to my latest post. His input is always greatly appreciated, and we often think of related references that I missed the first time through the topic. Here’s a passage he pointed out from Isaiah connecting the themes of blood, darkness, crookedness, injustice, and destruction — quite in line with Jesus’ comment about Abel and Zechariah:
As I mentioned in the prior post, I believe these themes, especially the blood of the innocent/prophets crying from the ground for justice, was so fundamental to the Israelite worldview that Mormon felt compelled to write these themes into his historical abridgment.
Another point that Stisa made to me was that I actually missed a clever example of “blood crying from the ground” in this account in Helaman 8-10. I noted that the corrupt judges did not act against Nephi out of a fear “lest [the people] should cry out against them” (Helaman 8:4). For me, seeing the words “cry out against them” was enough to make the connection, but I had completely forgotten about what comes next in the account.
What comes next in the account
Seeing that he had “gained favor” with some (v. 10), Nephi preaches about the power given to Moses by God to part the waters “hither and thither.” Next, he pivots to Abraham:
(Teaser: Stisa has some very interesting thoughts about the symbolic connections between Moses parting the Red Sea and God covenanting with Abraham which he’ll likely lay out in a future post.)
Next, Nephi speaks of all the prophets testifying of Christ. He cites many by name, and points out that their prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem has been fulfilled (evidenced by the presence of the Mulekites among them).
Here’s where we get to a direct (and an indirect) reference to Cain. The chapter concludes with these words:
Summarizing the key points here, Nephi tells them:
- they have rejected all the words of the prophets
- they are rejecting “all things, both … in heaven and … the earth.”
- instead of “laying up … treasures in heaven,” they are “heaping up for [themselves] wrath against the day of judgment.”
- they are ripening because of their “murders,” “fornication,” and “wickedness.”
- they are “ripening … for everlasting destruction,” which “now even at [their] doors.”
It is at this point that he prophesies about the murder of the chief judge, “[lying] in his blood, … murdered by his brother, who seeketh to sit in the judgment-seat.” It’s a prophecy of a re-enactment of the murder of Abel by Cain, complete with an allusion to God’s warning to Cain:
(Both of these references were pointed out to me by Stisa.)
Helaman 9-10
Chapter 9 recounts how Nephi and five others end up in captivity because of the dishonest actions of the leaders who are now desperate to counter this prophecy. They are saved by (you guessed it!) another miraculous prophecy, which also reveals the truth about the chief judge’s murderous, power-hungry brother (another allusion to Cain).
Then comes Helaman 10:1, a verse I absolutely love, which describes the parting of the people, as if to hint to the reader that Nephi possesses the same power as Moses–divine power to separate the wicked from the righteous by means of the word of God (symbolized by a rod). We are told that Nephi is given the power to command the elements and also given a charge to preach repentance, which he immediately does. After the people harden their hearts and reject his words, he emulates Moses again, in a way, and causes a drought (dividing the waters in the heavens from the ground — hat tip to Stisa again), which finally results in the people being humbled and repenting.
Conclusion
Once again we see how the covenant worldview of ancient Israel is on full display in the writings of Mormon. While recounting and abridging Nephite history, Mormon adds phrases and themes that highlight the similarity between these wicked Nephites and Cain. Once again, a story that seems strange and out of place turns out to be perfectly aligned with the symbolic, covenant worldview of the Israelites.
This is the work of a masterful scribe, trained in the highly symbolic literary tradition of the ancient near east, certainly not the work of an uneducated 19th century frontier day laborer.
Leave a comment